A poorly written hero often leads to the collapse of the project, and his return in new parts can seriously harm the plot. This landmark franchise also has such characters.
Not all heroes Assassin's Creed are equally good, and not all of them deserve to return in future installments of the franchise. We already talked about the best assassins of the entire series, which should actually appear in new games. They have a lot of blank spots in the story, and the characters are unique and interesting enough that players want to watch them for a little while longer. What about those who should never come back? Assassin's Creed has 5 of these assassins and we want to talk more about them.
Jacob Fry
Although Jacob's story was not fully completed, there is no real reason to return it. His descendant was also shown during the First World War, which means that he may be related to the events that take place at that time. However fan interest in his fate is simply not enough.
Unlike his sister, Jacob was the protagonist of one scene as he was completely focused on the mechanics of the kill rather than any deep meaning behind it. He just doesn't make much of a difference to the story.to guarantee his return, even as a flashback.
Connor Kenway
Although we recommend return to the old parts of the franchise after passing Valhalla, Connor is not the most attractive character to return in the new games of the series. His whole role in this story - this is the image of an "angry man", and looking at it again will simply be uninteresting. This image is too one-sided.
Connor was only important to the story for Desmond to gain access to the vault, after which he almost lost all meaning as a character. To make him viable again, the show will have to do a major rework and update of the hero., and this is not necessary.
Arno Dorian
There probably hasn't been a more empty image in this franchise than this guy. Usually, Arno takes the last places in the various TOPs of the heroes of the franchise. In fact, his entire arc revolved around a love story with Alice, after which he became extremely boring to watch.
Most people have already forgotten what his place in the franchise's plot is, and it would be silly to suddenly bring him back like he was ever important. The occasional mention here or there sounds fine, but the full resurrection of the character is out of the question.
Amunet (Aya)
Like Connor, Amunet was driven most by rage. Although this concept sounds good on paper, it's actually quite boring to follow this concept over and over again. And the story of the character is already complete, as she found her true calling and was happy with where she ended up at the end of her journey.
Another reason to consider her story finished is the fact that Assassin's Creed Odyssey showed that Amunet is a direct descendant of Cassandra. This means that she received a legacy from her ancestor-carrier eagle, thus closing the circle of her origin.
Cassandra
Her story has been completed to the point where even in fan stories, Cassandra's emotional and funny sides are little complemented. It also turned out that she remained alive for more than two thousand years. The heroine died only after she handed over the Staff of Hermes to Leila.
Although the decision to return her may seem interesting and easily implemented, because Cassandra can be shown any moment in her 2 years of seclusion, this is not necessary, since its end is already known. She has served her purpose and does not need to return in new installments of the franchise due to Amunet revealing herself as her descendant, thus effectively linking her to the assassins of the future.
Read on:
Arno Dorian has a cool story, they just need to make a game without bugs, you can connect the war of 1812 with Napoleon there.
Jacob fry if the fans didn't like it, then you need to create something unrealistically excellent with him, so that it's just wow and then it will be a success.
Connor Yes, you are right, but you can develop 4 assassins of Edward, for example, he found his father's tomahawk, his suit is a weapon, he is curious and looking for the truth, but the gameplay needs to be reworked and the world needs to be made bigger.
In principle, my opinion is clear, but this does not mean that I have a favorite assassin. Ezio is not bad either.
As if Connor is Edward's grandson....
Hero from Assassin Valhalla!
Connor! Seriously? At least he was trained, unlike his grandfather from Black Flag
Is Arno bad because Unity was badly optimized? He is good as an assassin, unlike the characters of the last 3 parts
Connor is one of the best assassins and a great character. Even though he made mistakes, he learned from them, and his path deserves special praise. In general, another subjective top.
Good afternoon 🙂
It's great that you found something interesting for yourself in Connor! However, he really has a very simple and trivial image 🙂
I’ll explain why this is not so, the plot was structured in such a way that Radunhageidu from a normal guy turned into a disgusting person who first betrayed his grandfather, who in fact raised him into a person capable of changing his fate, and then entrusted him with the work of an assassin, after which, offended by dedan radunhageidu follows the plot in which he plays the role of the evil uncle ubiaki, he made mistakes so stupid that even the most complete idiot would not have thought of doing so, if you want more details, go to GUZNO’s video about assassin 3, or I'll take a look, come back again and prove that Connor is an angry, offended and stupid useless Persian who learns from his mistakes that he could not have made
Did you understand what you wrote? What grandfather? Whom did he betray? He never knew his grandfather. I wonder why Ezio is considered the perfect assassin, even though he also made stupid mistakes. For example, did he understand that Ezio would not have saved his father and brothers with his cries of “This is a lie”? Or why leave Rodrigo, the chief Templar, alive? Like revenge will not return relatives? Connor found out that it was Washington who burned down his village, not Charles Lee. But he did not kill him, because he understood that the patriots needed a leader, and Connor killed Lee only because it was necessary for the Brotherhood and the destruction of the Templars. And after that, can Connor be considered offended and stupid? I don't think so. And unlike Ezio, Connor had to fight the Templars alone (if you count by the standards of the brotherhood) and restore the order of assassins from scratch, when Ezio was helped by influential people from the brotherhood (for example, Nicollo Machiavelli). Connor is more cold-blooded than Ezio and goes to the goal to the end, turning off his senses at the right time (this is proved by the murder of Haytham), which cannot be said about the Auditor. As a real assassin, he should not have given the keys to the tomb in Masyaf to the enemy, even if his love was threatened with death. And I doubt that when Ezio set fire to Cappadocia, no civilians were harmed.
I watched Guzno's video. There is practically nothing but subjectivity and he constantly swears, and insults those who liked part 3.
Cassandra is not an assassin at all, if anything.